|I.||Substantive International Law - First Part|
|8.||VIOLATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW AND RESPONSIBILITY OF STATES|
|8.9.||Consequences of an Internationally Wrongful Act|
Case Concerning the Land and Maritime
Boundary between Cameroon and Nigeria
(Cameroon v. Nigeria: Equatorial Guinea Intervening)
Judgment of 10 October 2002
[pp. ] 318. Cameroon, however, is not only asking the Court for an end to Nigerias administrative and military presence in Cameroonian territory but also for guarantees of non-repetition in the future. Such submissions are undoubtedly admissible (LaGrand (Germany v. United States of America), Judgment of 27 June 2001, paras. 117 et seq.). However, the Judgment delivered today specifies in definitive and mandatory terms the land and maritime boundary between the two States. With all uncertainty dispelled in this regard, the Court cannot envisage a situation where either Party, after withdrawing its military and police forces and administration from the others territory, would fail to respect the territorial sovereignty of that Party. Hence Cameroons submissions on this point cannot be upheld.
319. In the circumstances of the case, the Court considers moreover that, by the very fact of the present Judgment and of the evacuation of the Cameroonian territory occupied by Nigeria, the injury suffered by Cameroon by reason of the occupation of its territory will in all events have been sufficiently addressed. The Court will not therefore seek to ascertain whether and to what extent Nigerias responsibility to Cameroon has been engaged as a result of that occupation.