Dr. Arthur Dyevre
Forschungsschwerpunkte:
Comparative Judicial Politics, Comparative Constitutional Law, European Integration, Law and Economics
Wissenschaftlicher Werdegang:
Arthur Dyevre is a Senior Researcher for the Schumpeter Project "Constitutional Reasoning" based at the Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Law in Heidelberg, Germany. He has studied at various universities in Germany, France, the UK and United States and received his Ph.D from University of Paris I Panthéon Sorbonnne with a dissertation on judicial activism in France, Germany and the United States. He has held a Garcia Pelayo Fellowship at the Centro de Estudios Politicos y Constitucionales in Madrid and a Max Weber Fellowship at the European University Institute in Florence, Italy. He has taught courses in comparative constitutional law, European integration, EU law, government, and jurisprudence and legal theory. Straddling the boundaries of law and the social sciences, his publications cover a wide range of topics, including the EU constitutionalisation process, EU competition law, the role of national parliaments in the EU, statutory interpretation, legal theory and evolutionary psychology. The core of his research agenda, however, is the study of judicial institutions and judicial decision-making, both in the EU and accross legal systems of the world.
Aktuelle Publikationen
- Technocracy and Distrust: Revisiting the Rationale for Judicial Review, 2012. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2043262
- Judicial Non-Compliance in a Non-Hierarchical Legal Order: Isolated Accident or Omen of Judicial Armageddon?, 2012. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2084639
- France: Patterns of Argumentation in Constitutional Council Opinions, 2012. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2026396
- The French Parliament and European Integration. In: European Public Law 18, 527-547 (2012). thefrenchparliamentandeuropeanintegration.pdf (254.0 KB)
- "The Melki Way: The Melki Case and Everything You Always Wanted to Know About French Judicial Politics (But Were Afraid to Ask)". In: On Constitutional Conversations, Patricia Popelier (Hrsg.), OUP. 2012, 1-30. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1929807
- Game Theory and Judicial Behaviour. In: Game Theory and the Law, Jerzy Stelmach and Wojciech Zaluski (Hrsg.), Copernicus Center Press, 2011, 115-144. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1783507
- “The German Federal Constitutional Court and European Judicial Politics”. In: West European Politics 34, 346-361 (2011). http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01402382.2011.546578
- "Social Justice and the Judiciary: Will Judges React Differently in Different Member States to the Europeanization of Social Justice?". In: The Many Concepts of Social Justice in Private Law, W. Micklitz (Hrsg.), Edgar Elgar, 2011, 277-298. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1521742
Weitere Publikationen
- “Unifying the Field of Comparative Judicial Politics: Towards a General Theory of Judicial Behaviour,”. In: European Political Science Review 2, 297-327 (2010). PDF dyevrejudicialbehaviour.pdf (317.0 KB)
- “Comprendre et analyser l’activité décisionnelle des cours et des tribunaux : l’intérêt de la distinction entre interprétation et concrétisation,’’. In: Jus Politicum 4, 1-43 (2010). http://www.juspoliticum.com/IMG/pdf/Dyevre_JP4-3.pdf
- “Legal Positivism and Evolutionary Psychology: Can Darwin Do Something for Positivist Approaches to the Study of Law?,”. In: Studies in the Philosophy of Law vol. 5: Law and Biology, B. Brozek, M. Soniewicka, J. Stelmach (Hrsg.), Jagiellonian University Press, Krakow 2010, 103-124. legal_positivism_and_evolutionary_psychology.pdf (403.2 KB)
- « La prise en compte de critères extra-concurrentiels dans le droit communautaire de la concurrence ». In: Revue Internationale de Droit Economique 11, 415-440 (2007). http://www.cairn.info/publications-de-Dyevre-Arthur--21542.htm
- “The Empirical Case for Judicial Review: Judges as Agents and Judges as Trustees,”, 2010. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1694989
- “Making Sense of Judicial Lawmaking: A Theory of Theories of Adjudication,”, 2008. http://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/8510/MWP_2008_09.pdf?sequence=1