Sie befinden sich hier: Forschung Archiv Unter Archiv Comparative Study for the Venice Commission
Isabelle Ley
The Arab revolution as well as the Taksim square protests in Turkey raised new questions about the scope and precise meaning of the freedom of assembly. This project compared the freedom of assembly with a special view to these questions in Member States of the Venice Commission of the Council of Europe.
Evgeniya Yushkova
Halyna Perepelyuk
Orsolya Salát
Friederike Ziemer
Maria Stozek
Jannika Jahn
Rainer Grote
Melina Garcin
Steven Less
Elif Askin
In 2010, the European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission of the Council of Europe) in co-operation with the OSCE/ODIHR panel issued the 2nd edition of its guidelines on freedom of assembly, a comprehensive overview of the normative standards for freedom of assembly legislation within the Commission’s member states. In the Commission’s estimate, these standards presented the grown, established and prevalent principles and best practices of freedom of assembly regulations within its Member States. The guidelines were subject to revision by the Commission as well as the OSCE/ODIHR expert panel as new questions within the scope of the guidelines arose. These new questions concerned, inter alia, the use of social media in the organization of protests or the dynamic concept of the organizer of demonstrations. The comparative study on freedom of assembly regulation within the Commission’s Member States was meant to facilitate and inform this revision of the guidelines which was due in 2014.
In 2016 the book "The Freedom of Peaceful Assembly in Europe", was published by Nomos/Hart. It encompasses a brief introduction, eleven country reports, and an evaluative chapter in which comparative findings are presented.